Magnus Opifex Seven logo
    ← ServicesRETROSPECTIVE FIRE STRATEGY · UK

    Retrospective Fire Strategy for Existing Buildings

    Reconstruct the building's fire-safety design basis from the evidence that exists today.

    Scoped

    the instruction and exclusions are agreed in writing

    Evidence-led

    unknowns and access limits stay visible

    Actionable

    the output supports a defined project decision

    Design strategy and retrospective strategy are different instructions

    A design fire strategy is developed alongside a proposed design. A retrospective fire strategy examines an existing building and reconstructs its intended fire-safety basis from drawings, records, surveys and the conditions that can be observed.

    It is not retrospective approval. Missing evidence remains a recorded gap, and opening-up or specialist analysis is only included where separately agreed.

    When this service is useful

    Alterations, handovers and historic information gaps can leave owners unable to explain how the building is intended to perform.

    A retrospective fire strategy records the fire-safety arrangements observed and evidenced in an existing building, the assumptions that cannot yet be confirmed, and the further work needed to establish a usable design basis.

    Primary outcome

    A written existing-building fire strategy with evidence sources, assumptions, limitations and actions clearly separated.

    No reliable fire strategy can be located

    The building has changed use or layout

    Refurbishment needs an existing-design baseline

    Fire risk assessment actions reveal conflicting information

    Handover or due diligence requires a coherent record

    What your report includes

    Written outputs depend on the agreed scope.

    The report records the information supplied, the assumptions used, the limitations that apply and the actions or technical position within the agreed service scope.

    Document and drawing evidence register

    Existing fire-safety design-basis narrative

    Escape, compartmentation, systems and fire-service provisions review

    Schedule of assumptions and unresolved evidence

    Prioritised recommendations for further investigation or design work

    How we scope and coordinate the work

    The service is defined before the fee is quoted.

    The scope is set from the building facts, drawings, jurisdiction, project stage and the question the written output needs to answer.

    Scope point 01

    Evidence before inference

    Records and observations are separated from assumptions.

    Scope point 02

    Existing-building focus

    The review starts with what is actually present, not a theoretical new-build design.

    Scope point 03

    Clear next investigations

    Unresolved matters become scoped actions rather than hidden qualifications.

    From enquiry to written report

    A clear sequence from information request to issued output.

    Every stage records what has been supplied, what remains open and what the report can and cannot conclude.

    01

    Define the decision

    Agree why the strategy is needed and what evidence is available.

    02

    Review records

    Build an evidence register and identify conflicts or omissions.

    03

    Inspect

    Review accessible conditions against the agreed scope.

    04

    Reconstruct

    Set out the evidenced design basis and unresolved assumptions.

    05

    Issue

    Provide the report and prioritised further-work schedule.

    Recorded basis

    A scoped, documented technical process

    The question, available evidence, access and required output are agreed before a quotation is issued.

    Scope and exclusions agreed
    Evidence and limitations recorded
    Written output issued

    Result

    The report distinguishes evidenced arrangements, assumptions and unresolved gaps; it provides no retrospective approval.

    Information needed for a quotation

    What we need from you to scope the work.

    • Address, use, height, storeys and jurisdiction
    • Available drawings and historic strategies
    • Fire risk assessments, surveys and maintenance records
    • Known alterations and current access arrangements
    • The decision the strategy must support
    Scope boundaries

    What this service does not include.

    • This is not building-control approval or retrospective certification.
    • Concealed construction is not verified without agreed intrusive investigation.
    • The report does not replace a fire risk assessment for a building in use.
    • Unknown historic design decisions are recorded, not invented.
    Suitable scope examples

    Buildings and uses this service scope suits.

    These are examples of building types, uses and project contexts for which this service scope is suitable. They are scope examples, not a client list or a record of completed instructions.

    • Property management companies and housing associations
    • Building engineers and surveyors
    • Developers planning refurbishment
    • Owners and insurers reviewing legacy information

    Questions about this service

    Is this retrospective approval?

    No. It is an evidence-based review of an existing building, not approval, certification or confirmation that historic work complied.

    Will you need to open up the building?

    Possibly, but only where separately agreed. The initial scope records what can and cannot be established visually.

    Is this the same as a fire risk assessment?

    No. A fire risk assessment addresses operational fire risk; a retrospective strategy records the building's fire-safety design basis.

    Request a written scope

    Request a retrospective fire strategy review

    Send the building details, available records, known alterations and the decision the report must support.

    MO7

    Magnus Opifex SEVEN LTD

    Fire Safety & Fire Engineering Consultancy — London, UK

    Ready to Protect Your Next Project?

    From concept design to regulatory compliance, our fire engineering scope covers fire strategy, fire risk assessment, CFD smoke modelling and Building Safety Act 2022 support. Send project details for a scoped quotation.

    Founders & Leadership

    NS

    Nicoleta Vasile, Baroness of Brattleby

    Founder & CEO · Chief Legal Officer · Romanian-qualified Lawyer

    AS

    Alina Scarlat

    Technical Director & Fire Engineer (BEng)

    RV

    Răzvan Vasile

    Co-Founder & Chief Financial and Strategy Officer

    Head Office: 167-169 Great Portland Street, 5th Floor, London W1W 5PF
    © 2026 Magnus Opifex SEVEN LTD. All rights reserved.

    Send Inquiry

    Project enquiry · Written reply

    0/3000